"So don't become some background noise, A backdrop for the girls and boys who just don't know or just don't care, and just complain when you're not there. You had your time, you had the power, you've yet to have your finest hour." -- Radio Ga Ga
Monday, March 21, 2016
Demolish the Barriers to Procedural Matters
The issues between the neighbors on Woolman Street regarding the demolition only escalated because of a lack of written and comprehensive procedures clearly called out in black and white.
Principle #5 of my campaign is: GOVERNMENT HOUSE IN ORDER - Butte-Silver Bow must take care of their own house first. Procedures, information, departments must all have their own housekeeping in order. Disjointed efforts need to be consolidated into one-stop shopping for Butte citizens in providing services to assist their efforts.
The situation with the Woolman demolition and concerns between the two neighbors would have been diminished if the requirements for demolitions - including bonding, insurance and procedures - were clear to all concerned.
A detailed form to be filled out that fully covers the applicant's intent is a priority. This would spell out the execution of the work, mapping requirements, listing of qualified personnel, etc. This document would become the internal document "ONE STOP SHOP" that would be sent internally through BSB for various department review. Now, the applicant goes department to department for disjointed information.
Once reviewed. the document would be made available to the public for review and comment.
Had this been done, the adjacent property owner would have been allowed proper time to ask questions and get any assurances needed.
Clearly stated steps such as these, and adequate periods to review and comment, are STANDARD in procedures of basic State and Federal government.
This unfortunate situation was made a preservation folly by the press, when demolition was never the issue. It was the concerns of the neighbor for his property, which were ignored by BSB. All sides in such a situation need to be in agreement and respect each other. This did not remotely happen, and this needs to change.
Sunday, March 20, 2016
How to write a COMMUNICATION
There's been a lot of talk on social media lately about the confusion Uptown regarding intersections, lights, bike lanes, old lanes, new lanes, etc. The bottom line is that people are not feeling SAFE Uptown due to these issues. And they are unsure who to turn to.
This roadblock of who to call is not new, and it is an issue I am addressing in my campaign:
ACCESSIBILITY - Removing the barriers to the public's ability to understand and participate in local government decisions and community direction.
The best way and PROPER way to a request or complaint heard and acted upon is through your representative, who is your commissioner. You might think calling the courthouse will get issues addressed, but it will not. You might see some action, but no resolution.
The proper course of action should be from the citizen (you), through your commissioner,and through the entire council of commissioners with the Chief Executive addressing your concern through his/her staff. The reality is currently the REVERSE of this - Chief Executive down.
A phone call to your commissioner is basically just a complaint that will never be heard anywhere. To give your commissioner power to be heard, write a COMMUNICATION to the council of commissioners.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXAMPLE:
Chief Executive Vincent and the honorable members of the Butte-Silver Bow Council of Commissioners:
Date / / 2016
RE: (Your Issue - i.e. intersections) - A Communication to be read and acted upon
I have a significant issue/question regarding..........................................
I am requesting that this issue be addressed..............................................
Please provide me with all information regarding this issue - emails, regulations, decisions, etc.......
Please provide me with a written response in regards to the action(s) that are being, or have been taken. Please inform me of any meetings or requirements in regards to this matter and any formal action I must take.
Sincerely,
Butte resident
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This letter needs to be turned in by Friday at 2pm in order to be on Wednesday's agenda.
This is how government is supposed to work. Your issues should be addressed in a timely and professional manner. After all, this is YOUR government, your taxpayer money at work.
I know it is daunting, but it doesn't need to be and that is my goal.
Monday, March 14, 2016
Y not look at other options?
Half the
price and just as nice!
For just a
moment let us all consider an alternative to the current Administration's pool
concept at Stodden Park. An alternate facility that is more practical and
closer than you think: several hundred yards away from Stodden Park is a
competitive 25 yard lap pool. A zero-depth leisure pool with water side and
even a huge hot tub. Room for a "Lazy River" and a sun decks, one
with a Splash Pad and interactive water features and water blasters – All this
can be viewed from cabanas and outdoor lounge seating. How did this opportunity
get overlooked? It is simply too good to be true!
No, it is
simple, it is Butte YMCA, a year round facility. And with a little help and
construction can be just as nice at half the price.
(Please note that this
is my opinion as a candidate for Chief Executive of BSB and as a long time
supporter of the YMCA when it was Uptown and with its move. This opinion was
not solicited from the YMCA and is entirely my own.)
So the
currently proposed bond issue for Stodden Pool was reduced down from 8.7 million
to the 7.2 million with some smoke and mirrors. Now let us round that figure to
7 million. Cut that in half for 3.5 million. Per BSB's own estimate the
"bells and whistles" cost 1.5 million. Take that 1.5 million and
build the Lazy river (life guard required), splash pad and sun decks. By
building a splash pad (no life guard needed) instead of a shallow pool. Keep
the Y based price at $1.5 conservatively. That leaves 2 million dollars, that would be a really good start for
providing an addition to the YMCA construction for 2 basketball courts/gyms
with an indoor running track. Frame up a basic shell for Administrative area (office/daycare
and outdoor play) and free up more program space while finishing off some
available areas.
Let's talk
staffing. As a former life guard, I know
the the proposed conceptual design for Stodden Park is very difficult to staff.
Hidden areas in and around the interactive play equipment in a shallow pool
will be a problem to effectively staff. I estimate that 12 lifeguards minimum will
be required to cover the proposed concept, more than twice required to staff
the expanded YMCA facility.
Let's now go
to yearly maintenance, year after year. The tax payer fee to support a summer-only
facility is $350,000 annually. The YMCA manages to support its swim programs
and facility with extensive efforts in donation fund raising and membership
support. Remember that no one is ever denied at the Y with an inability to
pay! How is BSB going to determine economic
need when they are dependent on upon reduced entry fees, cabana rentals and
sugar rich concessions? Currently the YMCA gets $40,000 annually from
BSB to cover only a small portion of what it is providing
for BSB citizens. So let's drop off $300,000 from the Stodden Pool and
be generous with an additional $10,000 for $50,000 pubic support to the YMCA.
Let's now do
a math problem - I thought there would be
no math? 1.5 million for all the interactive water features, "lazy
river,” sun decks and all that, + 2 million for substantial improvement to the
YMCA - that equals 3.5 million. Thank our corporate and private citizens, once
again, for generous donation by Town Pump and others that should get to a 1
million dollars donated to a 501-C-3 not-for-profit. With 501-C-3s the donors
can actually avail themselves to a tax deduction.
Am I missing something? I am double checking
my math........... that???? ....## % & ***--- @ += so with donations that comes
out to be 2.5 million? That means
the citizens of Butte could vote on a considerably reduced bond issue at an
existing year-round facility that manages to provide for its operation and
maintenance and staffing. Why not just add back the 1 million dollars; $500,000
here and $500,000 their; that is back to 3.5 million bond with a $50,000 annual
operation levy.
So reducing
an 8.7 million dollar bond issue by 1.5 million to a $7.2 million bond with
$350,000 annually does not look as good as 3.5 million and $50,000
annually. Half the price and just as nice! & a
little less.
I am a
professional local Architect that has always been tasked with the prudent use
of public funds with public projects that have a limited budget. Please tell me
if I am wrong, from my aerial view from above my 3.5 million concept looks
better than the "pie in the sky" 7.2 million plan.
Butte Hill Oobleck
Oobleck -
does best describe the piles of "uncontained" melting snow piles
around Butte.
Dr. Seuss
(Theodor Geisel) in his book "Bartholomew and the Oobleck" describes
a disgusting mess of an additional seasonal precipitation - requested by the
King for a change of visual scenery - I believe we have achieved some quality
Butte Oobleck!
So in
several recent Ga Ga Blogs I have called for better snow removal. If you are going
to pick up and dispose of snow it has to go somewhere, correct? Some cities
have massive machines that melt the snow as it is dumped in, not practical nor
cost effective here in the Mountain West. So we pick it up and dump, but not at
the top of Mount Crumpit (another Seuss book).
The problem,
as I see it, is that these dump locations are not specifically designated nor
designed for this purpose. Have you seen these piles of Snow? The melting piles
are black, full of gravel, sand, trash, dog excrement, oil, road chemicals,
heavy metals mine-waste and various dead things - Oobleck indeed.
If our community is so worried about
environmental issues, issues that include storm-water-run-off, these piles of
Oobleck are just that: storm-water runoff when they melt, plus an assortment of
"Shuffle Duffle Muzzle Muff" to quote Seuss.
The hero of
the book is Bartholomew Cubbins, a young boy who makes the King say
"Sorry" for not fully thinking out the consequences of his Oobleck
decision. So let's get going on some good old planning efforts, take out the
map, see what BSB owns, draw in some radiuses and designate specific areas.
Our
environmental efforts talk about how wonderful our Superfund settling ponds
are. Well we need some constructed depressed areas for our frozen snow to melt
off, that contains the Oobleckian debris to be separated, cleaned-out and the
melted H2O to be filtered prior to being released into our creek and shared
with everyone else in the Columbia River Basin.
I have
always loved the wisdom of Seuss as he is able to put complicated issues into
words and pictures, concepts that a child and even an adult can understand.
Sunday, March 13, 2016
Let's get Plowed!
"Frozen"
"let it snow - let it snow" Let
it --- gooooooooo away!
As children are still singing the
theme to the animated Disney movie let us not forget what our snow covered
roads were like recently ......... I swear I saw Elsa in her blue dress and a little
snowman pushing out a stuck car this January.
The snow plowing and removal issue is
not simply an inconvenience, it is a significant economic development issue as
well as a public safety issue!
Butte is not a rich town with many struggling
paycheck to paycheck. Chastising a working citizen for not having a 4 x
4 truck with big knobby tires is no way to encourage the working public. When a
citizen is working 3 part-time jobs and misses work and gets fired because they
are stuck or can't navigate the roads - the snow-laden roads are a direct
detractor to the Butte Economy.
As for public safety - the lack of more
extensive snow plowing is a critical issue that has threatened human safety and
property. On Galena Street this winter the fire department was limited on being
able to effectively access an apartment fire. Snow plows had to be brought in
order to fully reach the burning building, resulting in precious time wasted, impacting human and structure survival.
" So what is your solution Mr.
Chief Executive candidate?" The solution seems obvious to me with public
safety being the critical factor. I believe that all paid and volunteer fire
departments should be budgeted to purchase 4 wheel drive trucks equipped with
snowplows. I am not talking about brand new shiny trucks, but used 4x4s in good
condition. These plows would be able to clear the areas in-front of each
station as well as make their rounds clearing additional road paths that are not
on Butte's primary and secondary snow removal routes. This small fleet of used
4x4s would also be tasked with uncovering Butte's snow covered fire-hydrants, a
critical issue in effective firefighting; can't fight the fire is you can't
find the hydrant.
It might be nice next winter to give
Elsa and Olaf a helping hand. I can see a fleet of bright blue trucks with
"Frozen" Disney (with permission) character faces and names on their
side doors - Go Olaf - go! "Let's it get Plowed"
Saturday, March 12, 2016
An Historic Erection
BSB Master Gardener Norm DeNeal's Lexington Gardens, a huge local and tourist draw in Uptown Butte.
It's time
for an historic erection!...... The Alta headframe deserves one!
The only
reason the Alta headframe is seeing any traction at this time is because it was
run over with multiple tread-marks while being desecrated during Evel Knievel
Days. No one has identified the 3 "Mopes" that grabbed the timbers to
build a motorcycle obstacles course in the Original Mineyard; but it is a fact
that Chief Executive Matt Vincent allowed them to remain in place and be
damaged after it was adamantly demanded that they be put back and protected
prior to the Knievel event.
Yes, many of
the timbers are old but others were manufactured at great expense as
replacement members so that the Alta could be erected per agreements between
the Federal Agency BLM and BSB.
There were
many people, including myself, appalled by the desecration and mistreatment of
the Federally owned and loaned frame as a dirt-bike obstacle course.
As always, BSB assured all those
angered that BSB would make the situation right. After years of waiting, Norm
DeNeal would finally get to erect this headframe – after the damage was covered
up and repaired. This promise was basically to keep this incident quiet.
But in
typical non-transparent BSB fashion they let the dirt-bike dust settle with
nothing in writing. – Oh. I finally get it after 3 years. "Transparency"
means that all promises are written in disappearing ink. Now it was time to pay
the piper and nobody wanted to.
The tragedy
of all of this is that Norm is now having to jump through burning hoops in
order to make this “promise” happen. (Read: BSB agrees but sets impossible
requirements)
Norm, a BSB contract employee, is required to get
zoning approval and provide insurance for the Alta headframe. Um…..what?
The Lexington Gardens spot. Norm's vision for a garden.
It is great
to see that my Hero Norm finally got the attention he deserves in pursuing another
of his projects. Think about what Butte would look like without him; Norm's pursuits
of enhancing our environment and remembering and interpreting our mining history
must be commended and BSB should, as they did in the beginning, provide all
necessary assistance.
The
Washington School site (owned by BSB) with the Lexington Gardens features a
Columbia Gardens inspired Butterfly. The Lex Gardens also features a depression
era headframe (the Silversmith) saved from Walkerville along with a Stamp-mill
from Pony, MT that likely first saw service in Butte and more than likely at
the garden site itself. Norm has made it clear in his interpretation that these
are interpretive features, though per the US Department of the Interior May-not
technically qualify as "Historic" by being moved.
The Lexington Gardens taking shape with non-original features
I understand
that some preservationists are adamantly opposed to placing a relocated
headframe in the historic district that may or may not technically be historic.
But let's face the reality of Buttes Headfames, they were moved, replaced and set up again at other locations
- with examples of this being the
Anselmo frame (originally located further up on the hill), the Parrot and the
smaller adjacent frame at the Kelley. So what is technically historic and
carved in stone is the actual shaft location, with the location being
acknowledged (that being the "Clear Grit" silver mine) and
interpreted by installing signage that calls out the Silver Mining Era of
Montana. Drive by signage, similar to
that at our other mines, will acknowledge the technical distinction of the ALTA
@ the Clear Grit.
So travel up
Main Street and look at the location, also look at what Norm has done with his
Aspen Forest (nearby) that he has created to enhance our environment. Swing by
the Lexington Gardens and talk to him as he cleans up in preparation of the
blooms of spring and thank him for the displays at the Pit entry.
BSB should
not be hindering Norm, they should be assisting him aggressively by providing
man power, equipment, funding, zoning approval and insurance coverage. Norm is
virtually a one-man-show, and he is aging. It will take a small army to replace
what he does for this community.
The time is now to rally around Norm, create a
new group of volunteers to help with the Alta and carry on with his efforts. If
Norm goes to the Great Garden in the Sky sooner than any of us want, we best be
prepared.
Face it, we
are all getting older and we need a little help, as John Wayne got older in his
move career. It is going to take some "True Grit" - Butte needs to
muster some "Grit" and do the right thing at the Clear Grit.
As far as
using ANY historic resources for destructive events, well, that’s for another
blog post.
Friday, March 11, 2016
Saving Butte's Iconic Headframes and Mining History
This is a blogpost I wrote 2 years ago for our uptownbutteworks blog
The cutting torches were fired up. 2/3 of the chippy hoist at the Mountain Con was destroyed. The primary drive axle at the double-drum hoist was severed and all copper motor components taken. The ore bin at the Kelley Mine was partially dismantled. In the wake of the mine closure in the early 80's, Butte was being raped and robbed of its visible mining history.
John T. Shea, a retired ACM Ropeman (ironworker) that worked at mines all over the Butte hill, watched out his kitchen window as the Mountain Con was being ransacked. The headframes were next. The rallying cry was then sounded by John:
"You might cut down one headframe," he declared, "but you'll be hanging from the next."
As the local Historic Preservation Officer whose job it was to preserve resources, this destruction made me physically ill. I marched into the Mountain Con yard and, blood boiling, demanded proof of permission for this "salvage." They had none. A pile of molten, smoking metal lay beneath the severed 18" axle.
Without the passion of the residents of Butte and their willingness to fight for the history of their town, we would have nary a headframe gracing the hill. Perhaps only the Orphan Girl at the WMM. We would have no Original Mineyard for festivals and weddings, no intact Anselmo Mineyard. No Mountain Con towering over a beautiful park.
The main problem was that the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) was being ignored by those in control (BSB). Because not only was Butte historic, it was a National Historic Landmark that required even more Federal compliance than usual. This continues to be an issue to this very day.
Perseverance equals preservation. For 20 years I did my job as a BSB employee, which was insisting on governmental following of Federal regulation while up against politicos and their self-serving desires.
In the end that perseverance cost me my job, but it made preservation of our resources happen. Was it worth it? Yes. Every second. Because when I look up at the Butte Hill, I feel a sense of pride and accomplishment for a job well done. 5/2014
The resources that we have in Butte, that are now so beloved, almost did not survive. People have to understand that this is what VISION is. The process of saving resources and slowly turning them into parks and trails and venues takes years of planning and finding money. Those were, and remain my strengths. I am proud because Butte would not be the place it is without my hard work and perseverance in the face of a lot of negative adversity.
John T. Shea, a retired ACM Ropeman (ironworker) that worked at mines all over the Butte hill, watched out his kitchen window as the Mountain Con was being ransacked. The headframes were next. The rallying cry was then sounded by John:
"You might cut down one headframe," he declared, "but you'll be hanging from the next."
As the local Historic Preservation Officer whose job it was to preserve resources, this destruction made me physically ill. I marched into the Mountain Con yard and, blood boiling, demanded proof of permission for this "salvage." They had none. A pile of molten, smoking metal lay beneath the severed 18" axle.
Without the passion of the residents of Butte and their willingness to fight for the history of their town, we would have nary a headframe gracing the hill. Perhaps only the Orphan Girl at the WMM. We would have no Original Mineyard for festivals and weddings, no intact Anselmo Mineyard. No Mountain Con towering over a beautiful park.
The main problem was that the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) was being ignored by those in control (BSB). Because not only was Butte historic, it was a National Historic Landmark that required even more Federal compliance than usual. This continues to be an issue to this very day.
Perseverance equals preservation. For 20 years I did my job as a BSB employee, which was insisting on governmental following of Federal regulation while up against politicos and their self-serving desires.
In the end that perseverance cost me my job, but it made preservation of our resources happen. Was it worth it? Yes. Every second. Because when I look up at the Butte Hill, I feel a sense of pride and accomplishment for a job well done. 5/2014
The resources that we have in Butte, that are now so beloved, almost did not survive. People have to understand that this is what VISION is. The process of saving resources and slowly turning them into parks and trails and venues takes years of planning and finding money. Those were, and remain my strengths. I am proud because Butte would not be the place it is without my hard work and perseverance in the face of a lot of negative adversity.
Thursday, March 10, 2016
Pissing in the Public Pool
Don't piss
in the pool and tell me it is not yellow!
And don't tell me that all public money,
whatever the source, is NOT public money when it is directed into the pool!
As with all of my Wednesdays, I enjoy
attending the Council of Commissioners meetings to observe all the falderal
that takes place with your/my/our tax money.
A half an
hour prior to the Council meeting, I attended the Judiciary Committee. A brave
citizen stood up at the Judiciary committee and spoke up regarding the $500,000
dollars pledged by Matt Vincent at a staged event in the BSB rotunda yesterday.
He was instantly accused of “not understanding” the fund and its uses. But in
fact, he understood more than the commissioners at the table.
The $500,000 commitment was yet to be approved
for expenditure by the Council of Commissioners. (Just “dropped in their laps”
per their usual complaint). This non-approved pledge was being offered to
reduce the cost to tax payers for the pool bond issue.
Vincent, the
County Attorney and BSB Budget Director spent considerable time explaining to
the Judiciary Committee that this public money was not really public money, it was 1980 money, from an ARCO tax settlement,
so that this public money does not really count as public money! (where is the
logic here?) The pool seems to be
getting warmer……
This money in
the past has been used for critical public needs for such things as collateral
to back bond issues, renovating the Courthouse elevator and a new boiler for
the Civic Center. These were all critical needs that required public money.
Let us travel back to this ARCO tax settlement
that is in the public trust
as public money. The use of a reserve fund to back a bond issue as collateral
makes sense, but expending the money under the cover of water as a reduction to
the tax payer should be difficult water to swallow, considering what it
contains. BSB will always have bonds to back, grants to match and emergencies
to address and all of these will take tax payer money to accomplish.
If the
voters decide to vote for the pool bond for the construction of a summer use
pool and wet-playground and its never-ending maintenance, the vote should stand
entirely upon its own merits without any additional public money. If Community
members and corporation wish to help with their generosity, I commend them.
As for me I stand by my already stated opinion
regarding the pool and highly recommend voting NO! on the pool bond issue. With the hopeful rejection of
the bond for the pool I would recommend channeling all public generosity to the
YMCA aquatics facility and its programs and develop a long-term public private
partnership with the Y. There is plenty of room for a sun (skin-cancer) deck,
splash pad and even a lazy river at a substantially reduced construction and
maintenance cost for a facility that with a few additions fully meets the
proposed Stodden pool. The Y operates
year-round, and can accommodate swimmers during inclement summer weather. It
has excellent staff, established swim programs and in all honesty does not need
any duplication. The Y is a nonprofit
that collects significant donations and does so many great things for the
community besides the pool and programs within its walls. The Y is a proven
entity that contributes greatly, with real dollars to our economy through its
programs and staffing.
This pool
issue is being soiled by twisted truths and misinformation, coming from the
person we are supposed to trust the most with our public money, grandstanding
on a fund he has no right to use in this way. Do not be misled.
Saturday, March 5, 2016
The Economics of Festivals
Caesar! It
is not all about the spectacle!
Various
Roman emperors would put on exuberant spectacles in the Coliseum to entertain
the populous when there was dissatisfaction within the Roman Senate. Our
festivals have taken on this appearance as the years have rolled on. Everyone
seems to love the festivals as an apparent free party; but as your parents
would tell you "there is no free lunch." Someone is paying, but no
one seems to have any idea how much.
There is no
doubt that the summer festivals have had a positive benefit in promoting Butte
and changing the minds of many Montanan's impression of Butte from a negative
to a positive.
The issue at hand is that these Festivals have a never-ending appetite
for additional funding. Specific allocated public funds are never enough and
these established organizations and groups ask for funding each year after
year.
When the URA
first established funding for events and festivals, their program requirements
were set up with limits on the amount of funding with a requirement of a 20%
reduction each year until the event was self-sustaining. This has not remotely happened.
In fact the appetite for money has grown each year, dipping into such funds as
economic development money that, in my opinion and by established guidelines, would
be better utilized for new economic opportunities, not old established ones.
The “in-kind”
donation of people hours and equipment by BSB is not free. Hours worked are
logged in, salaries are paid, equipment used is charged against the BSB budget
and fuel is utilized. This in-kind
donation by BSB is an actual cost.
In addition,
our summer construction season is short, and equipment used for such critical
needs as road construction are diverted to support the summer festivals. No one
can dispute that our roads are NOT in premier shape.
BSB equipment and man power should be utilized
on basic public works projects. Required festival setup and construction should funded by
the various event organizations that should be utilizing local contractors, labor
and volunteers.
It was also
quite amusing that one week before a certain festival last summer, the Head of Public
Works declared “all potholes filled.” So, in essence, we would make the
connection that all equipment being utilized, all day long, for a week before
and after the festival, was not really needed for public works. Ok……….
There is
always a lot of talk about the economic impact of the festivals, estimates of
visitation and the amount of money brought into the economy. It is difficult to
believe that some of the reports are valid considering that virtually all of
the vendors are from out of town, whether they be food vendors or out of town
crafts persons. The vendors pay fees that support the festival and the profit
goes to the out of towner. Local motels see a spike in overnight stays but not
dramatically. Visitors often come for one day and are from a 200 mile radius.
I can tell you from experience in owning a
gift shop business in the heart of Uptown on the corner of Montana and Park
Street that our worst summer days were during festivals. We might as well have
closed our doors and simply enjoyed the event.
Public
comments were “Well, you must have raked it in during the festival with all
those people in town!” Um… no. It is an urban legend for retailers that the
festivals line their pockets. Ask any retail business in Uptown Butte during
the festivals if business is great during the festivals, virtually all will say
no.
Some restaurants and bars have indicated good paydays,
but not extraordinary. Festival goers are buying over-priced funnel cakes and
other food and buying crafts from various artisans; the last thing a sun burned
festival goer is going to do is shop local. Uptown merchants work and pay taxes
for 365 days of the years vs. the limited days of the festivals.
Our sporting
events and various tournaments have significant impacts to the local economy
that are tracked quite accurately. Families purchase meals, stay in hotels and
visit attractions.
This same
type of accurate tracking should be applied to the various festivals. Some
Festivals have paid staff, others are all volunteer and others are set up to
make money. Some festivals receive significant amounts of public support and
money and other very little. Some festivals are virtually self sufficient while
others are always requesting more money.
The point
here is that all festivals should become self-sustaining and that all of these
events should be treated with a formula of equality based upon the positive and
proven economic benefit to the community.
I am not
advocating ending public funding or support of festivals, but I am advocating for
the careful evaluation of their true impacts and costs to the tax payer. I have
specifically not called out any particular event or festival on purpose, because
the formula to evaluate their benefit has yet to be developed. The evaluation of each festival can be
undertaken in a fair and impartial manner. It will certainly not be a major
crisis if a festival has to be slightly downsized, location adjusted or its
schedule and programs revised. Fair is fair and local taxes should certainly benefit
local citizens and business because basically the free festivals are actually
being paid for with your money.
There is no better history of a "Free Festival" becoming a financial suckhole than "Burning Man." You might want to check it out.
Friday, March 4, 2016
Gagging on Government Ga Ga
A Taste of Vomit!
I just
threw-up in my mouth a little bit with the announcement of putting a sign
proclaiming "Welcome to Butte - (& Anaconda) National Historic
Landmark" (District) on the site of 2 previously viable historic buildings
that were demolished by BSB at taxpayer expense. The irony made my stomach
churn and urp-up at the misdirection of our current local Administration.
It has once
again been acknowledged in the Montana Standard that: "The commissioners voted to pursue two other
options before settling on that plan, which Chief Executive Matt Vincent's team
had suggested from the get-go". That plan being: "The corner is among the busiest in Butte, and Community
Development Director Karen Byrnes has said a green gateway would be pleasing image
to both residents and tourists visiting Uptown."
This
"get-go" plan confirms that prior to the demolition of the Brincks
& Deluxe (Bennett Blocks 1 &2) plans for placing a green gateway were
understood by the Vincent Administration. This pre-planning is known as "Anticipatory Demolition,” a
clear violation of Federal Law under the National Historic Preservation Act
within a National Historic Landmark District.
BSB applied
for and received Federal Highway funds know as CTEP (Community Transportation
Enhancement Program) for the "Green Gateway" at the Front & Utah
project. All Federal funded projects must comply with all Federal laws from
clean water & air "Acts" to Historic Preservation requirements.
The pre-planned gateway and "Demolition" should have mandated a required
process under the National Historic Preservation Act known as "Section
106" of that Act; this 106 process was not conducted. The current
expenditure of federal "Highway Enhancement" funds is in violation of
the National Historic Preservation Act. BSB is obligated to be in compliance
with Federal Historic Preservation Laws as a "Certified Local
Government" that receives Federal money for it local preservation program.
I simply Can't say anything more because
of the bad taste in my mouth, don't you just hate that when it happens? Gagging
on Government Ga Ga
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)